Conservative legal experts crushed Mahmoud Khalil’s latest ruling

A Federal District judge said on Wednesday that Trump’s administration’s efforts to deport Mahmoud Khalil may be unconstitutional, but some conservative legal experts do not buy it.

Khalil is an anti-Israel activist who directed protests at Columbia University. An immigration judge recently said he could be deported, but Judge in the North -American District Michael Farbiarz for the New Jersey district said that the order is likely to be rejected as “unconstitutionally vague”. However, Khalil will remain in remand.

“District court stated what we already knew: Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio’s immigration law weapon to punish Mahmoud and others like him is probably unconstitutional, “said Khalil’s lawyers after the judge’s ruling.

Federal Judge says that the anti-Israel Ring head of deportation, Mahmoud Khalil, may be unconstitutional

However, several conservative legal experts do not agree with the judge.

“A judge had just given Hamas a victory to the American soil. Mahmoud Khalil headed for our country, hid the ties with a foreign regime, and then Cooke told Fox News Digital in a statement.

Click here for more immigration coverage

“ The Supreme Court has made it clear to this crystal of power. In Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972), the court confirmed the extension of the executive in immigration issues. This authority was reaffirmed to Trump V.

Ringleader anti-Israel Mahmoud Khalil’s free expression demand for the United States Government: Judge

Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies to an audience of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on May 20. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

“When declaring the immigration and nationality law,” unconstitutionally vague, “Judge Farbiarz does not interpret the law, which rewrites it. This violates the separation of powers and dangerously leizes the hands of our commander -in -chief. Citizens are a privilege, not a sanity for liars and supporters of Hamas.

Hans von Spakovsky, a Heritage Foundation Higher Foundation, said that it is a “ridiculous and accrued claim of a federal judge” and said that although Kahlil is a Legal U.S. legal resident, he can still face consequences.

“ Aliens have no constitutional right to be in the United States, according to the Federal Immigration Law, 8 USC 1227, aliens as Khalil, including permanent resident aliens, can be eliminated if the foreigner “ endorses or wife terrorist activity ” or supports “ a terrorist organization. ‘

Actors of Columbia Anti-Israel Activist, Mahmoud Khalil Blast Rust Rubio, Test Letter: “Two pages, this is”

People gather to protest in support of Mahmoud Khalil in front of a federal court in Newark, New Jersey, on March 28. (Stephanie Keith for Fox News Digital)

The White House also condemned the ruling, continuing its frequent clashes with federal judges on immigration policy.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“In Mahmoud Khalil received the privilege of coming to America to study, but he missed this opportunity to join Hamas terrorists and organize protests that interrupted university classes and besiege Jewish-American students. The Rubio State Secretary has the right to revoke green cards or visas for anyone who are adversaries in the United States’s foreign policy and the interests of national security. Blanca, said a white house.

Anders Hagstrom and Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.